Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China - Proposals to implement Article 23 of the BASIC LAW
Learn more about Article 23  - Leaflets
Focus
News Room
Resources
National Security Quiz
TV Messages
Press Conference

Search
 
 

News Room Traditional ChineseSimplified ChineseSite MapContact Us

Tel .: 2810 2712
Fax : 2810 2261

6 June 2003

The Editor
Washington Times


Dear Sir,

Your editorial "Wither Hong Kong" (June 5) is shot through with inaccuracies and false allegations.

Our National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill compares favourably with similar legislation in other common law jurisdictions and is in full accord with international human rights standards. Offences such as subversion and treason would require the use of force or serious criminal acts similar to terrorist activities, or engaging in war. There is no truth whatsoever in the allegation that the Government "would have the power to imprison someone for seven years without a trial" for alleged seditious activity. Nor is there any truth in the allegation that "journalists could be jailed for reporting any news unfavourable to the government". Under the Official Secrets Ordinance, which is based on the UK Official Secrets Act, an offence of unlawful disclosure would only be committed if a person knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that the information belongs to a protected category, and that disclosure of such information would be damaging. Only four categories of information are protected under the Official Secrets Ordinance, namely, information relating to security and intelligence, defence, international relations and commission of criminal offences and investigation. The circumstances under which damage may be caused are strictly defined under the Ordinance. "National security" is tightly defined under our laws, meaning only the protection of territorial integrity and independence of the People's Republic of China. Fundamental rights and freedoms of Hong Kong people are fully protected under the Basic Law. There is no question of the freedom of expression being suppressed.

Moreover, any person charged with treason, secession, sedition, subversion or any of the unlawful disclosure offences could opt for trial by jury. Whether anyone is convicted would ultimately be determined by the jury.

Yours faithfully,



( Mrs Regina Ip )
Secretary for Security
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

 

 

 

 

Back

Last Updated : 13-6-2003
  Copyright/Notice