|
National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill
Protection of rights and freedoms |
The Basic Law
The Basic Law was enacted by the National People's Congress in accordance with the Constitution of the PRC and is the constitutional document of the HKSAR. The systems and policies practised in the HKSAR, including the social and economic systems, the system for safeguarding the fundamental rights and freedoms of its residents, the executive, legislative and judicial systems shall be based on the provisions of the Basic Law.
| 
|
|
No law enacted by the legislature of the HKSAR shall contravene the Basic Law, including its provisions on the protection of freedoms and rights.
|
| 
|
Freedoms are fundamental rights
In an open and democratic society, the government is subject to close public scrutiny. Protection of the freedom of speech serves to guarantee the rights of the public to form and effectively communicate their opinions, including those that are critical of government policies and measures. The right of assembly and the freedom of association enable citizens to join forces to express their views more effectively.
Freedom of speech, of assembly and of association are not absolute, as the exercise of the rights of the individual can have a detrimental effect on the rights of others and on society as a whole and should therefore be subject to necessary restrictions. As recognized under many international covenants, constitutions and legislation, the exercise of freedoms and rights of the individual carries with it special duties and responsibilities.
Constitutional protection under the Basic Law
Chapter 3 of the Basic Law protects the freedom of speech, of the press, of publication, of association, of assembly, of procession, of demonstration, of religious belief, and the freedom to engage in academic research, literary and artistic creation. Restrictions on such rights and freedoms must comply with the provisions of the two international human rights covenants as applied to Hong Kong.
The ICCPR, which is applied to Hong Kong through Article 39 of the Basic Law, spells out the responsibilities carried with the exercise of the rights and freedoms.
 |
|
"Everyone shall have
the right to freedom of expression; this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas of all kinds, regardless
of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print,
in the form of art, or through any other media
of his choice. .... (The exercise of the right
to freedom of expression) carries with it special
duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be
subject to certain restrictions, but these shall
only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order
(ordre public), or of public health or morals."
- for details, see Article 19
of the ICCPR
"Everyone shall have
the right to freedom of association ....
No restrictions may be placed
on the exercise of this right other than those
which are prescribed by law and which are
necessary
in a democratic society in the interests of national
security or public safety, public order (ordre
public) ...."
- for details, see Article 22
of the ICCPR
|
 |
All laws that implement Article 23 must not contravene the human rights protections stipulated in the Basic Law.
Clear safeguards stipulated by the Bill
The offences are strictly defined in the Bill and they are consistent with the human rights provisions of the Basic Law. No one will mistakenly breach the law.
An internationally renowned specialist in human rights law, Mr David Pannick, QC, pointed out in his opinion to the HKSAR Government that the proposals in the consultation paper are consistent with the protection of human rights.
The Bill is based on existing legislation. All provisions will be interpreted by the Hong Kong courts in accordance with the common law principles. Mainland legal concepts will in no way be extended to Hong Kong.
Compliance with Chapter III of the Basic Law explicitly
specified
To further protect human rights, the Bill explicitly
specifies that all provisions must be enforced, applied
and interpreted in accordance with Chapter III of the
Basic Law. In other words, the provisions must comply
with the standards of international human rights covenants.
Freedom of speech will not be undermined
The proposed offence of 'sedition' under the Bill adopts the existing common law concept of 'incitement'. Under common law, 'inciting' others to commit a substantive offence, such as murder or theft, is itself an offence.
| 
|
|
To convict a person of the common law offence of 'incitement', the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that :
(a) he has compelled or encouraged others to commit a crime; and
(b) he has the intention that others, after being incited by him, shall commit the crime.
Therefore, if the person does not believe that others would commit the offence incited, he does not commit an offence of 'incitement' because he lacks the requisite intention. |
|
|
Sedition is defined in the Bill to mean 'inciting'
others to commit treason, secession or subversion, or
inciting others to engage in violent public disorder
which would seriously endanger the stability of the
PRC. The offence is firmly based on common law principles
and is consistent with the international standards on
protection of freedom of speech. The scope of criminal
law has not been expanded.
The 'intention' and 'likelihood' principles
of the Johannesburg Principles are included in the
proposed amendments to the Bill to further safeguard
the above freedoms. Freedom of the press is fully protected
To ensure that the offence of unlawful disclosure
would not impede the freedom of the press and the free
flow
of information, and to ensure that the Government remains
open and transparent, the Bill explicitly stipulates
that the interpretation of the provisions of unlawful
disclosure must also comply with Chapter III of the
Basic
Law.
When investigating any of the Article 23 offences,
judicial warrants must be obtained before journalistic
materials can be searched or seized. The proposed emergency
investigation powers will not apply to the search and
seizure of journalistic materials.
Judicial safeguards
The independence and integrity of the judiciary of Hong Kong is well-recognized by the international community.
Provisions implementing Article 23 are local laws, and will operate entirely within the existing common law framework. The rights of residents are fully protected.
As an additional safeguard, the Bill further provides
that the consent of the Secretary for Justice must be
obtained before prosecution of the relevant offences
can be instituted.
The Bill clearly stipulates that people charged with
treason, secession, subversion, sedition or unlawful
disclosure will either be tried by jury or given a right
to opt for jury trial if they so wish. Whether a person
is convicted would ultimately be determined by a jury.
Jurors are selected randomly from members of the public,
thus guaranteeing that the widely accepted social values
will be reflected.
|
To find out more about the Bill to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law, please obtain the text of the Bill at the Public Enquiry Service Centres of District Offices or visit the website: www.basiclaw23.gov.hk
|
|