Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China - Proposals to implement Article 23 of the BASIC LAW
Learn more about Article 23  - Leaflets
Focus
News Room
Resources
National Security Quiz
TV Messages
Press Conference

Search
 
 

Learn more about Article 23  - Leaflets Traditional ChineseSimplified ChineseSite MapContact Us

Fulfilment of Constitutional Duty
Implementation of Article 23 of the Basic Law

photo

Implementation of 'One Country, Two Systems' Safeguarding National Security
* The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) has a constitutional duty to enact laws to give effect to Article 23 of the Basic Law.
* The National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill proposed by the Government amends and improves upon the existing laws on treason, sedition and official secrets, resulting in more liberal provisions.
* The Bill stipulates explicitly that the interpretation, application and enforcement of all its provisions must comply with Chapter III of the Basic Law, which incorporates international human rights standards. The freedoms and rights of Hong Kong residents as stipulated in the Basic Law will continue to be protected.
photoEnacting laws now to give effect to Article 23 of the Basic Law is beneficial to the implementation of 'One Country, Two Systems' principle and is in the long-term interests of Hong Kong. We appeal to the public to support the enactment of the Bill to safeguard national security under the Basic Law and the 'One Country, Two Systems' principle.

Top

 

Extensive consultation and thorough discussions
Proposals to give effect to Article 23 have been fully and thoroughly discussed by all sectors of the community since the publication of the Consultation Document last September.
After three months of extensive public consultation, Government introduced the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill into the Legislative Council for detailed scrutiny in February this year. After fully taken into account public views, appropriate amendments have also been made to the proposals.
photo Public consultation and scrutiny of the Bill
Copies of Consultation Document and Leaflets
more than 1,500,000
Submissions to the Government
more than 100,000
Meetings and interviews attended by officials
more than 300
Joint panel meetings held by Legislative Council
more than 30 hours
Organisations and individuals attending public hearings of LegCo
(consultation stage)
more than 110
(scrutiny of the Bill)
totalling 110
Bills Committee meetings
more than 90 hours
Documents and submissions presented to the Bills Committee
more than 290

Top

 

Mainland laws will not be introduced
* The Bill was drafted in accordance with the principles of 'One Country, Two Systems' and that the HKSAR shall legislate on its own, on the basis of existing laws and the common law. The laws enacted will operate under the framework of the present legal system of Hong Kong.
*

All provisions, including the meaning of 'national security' and categories of information protected under the Official Secrets Ordinance, will be defined by the laws of Hong Kong, and will ultimately be interpreted by the courts of Hong Kong.

Top

 

Multiple safeguards for human rights and freedoms
* The rights and freedoms of HKSAR residents, including the freedom of speech, of the press, of procession, demonstration and association, and freedoms stipulated under international human rights covenants, are protected through Chapter III of the Basic Law.

*

All local legislation, including those implementing Article 23 of the Basic Law, cannot override these protections under the Basic Law.

*

To underline these protections, the Bill explicitly stipulates that the interpretation, application and enforcement of all provisions must comply with Chapter III of the Basic Law.

*

The provisions of the Bill have been clearly and tightly drafted. Existing definitions and provisions that are too wide in scope have been repealed, resulting in national security laws that better comply with the present constitutional arrangements and human rights standards.
*

Defendants of relevant offences will have the right to be tried by jury. Whether a person is convicted will ultimately depend on the jurors who are selected randomly from the population and reflect the values of the community.

Top

 

Tight and clear definition of offences
Treason

The present definition of treason is narrowed to acts that involve foreign elements and war. Only the instigation of a foreign invasion with force, the assistance of a public enemy at war with China or the joining of foreign armed forces at war with China would amount to treason.

The definition of 'war' is limited to actual war or open armed conflict, and does not include ordinary demonstrations or even riots. The freedom of speech, of the press, of procession, of demonstration and of assembly are fully protected.

The offence of misprision of treason under common law will be abolished. This will allay public concerns about criminalising the failure to report the crime and that relatives and friends would be keeping each other under surveillance. Treason will apply only to Chinese nationals whether within or outside the HKSAR.

photoSecession

Secession refers to the use of war, or force or serious criminal means of an extent that seriously endanger territorial integrity, to split the country.

Subversion

Subversion refers to the use of war, or force or serious criminal means of an extent that seriously endanger the stability of the state, to overthrow or intimidate the Central People's Government, or to disestablish the basic system of the state by such means.

Only the actual use of force or serious criminal means akin to terrorist activities could make one liable to the secession or subversion offences. Expressing views by means of peaceful procession, assembly, demonstration, etc. will not be criminalised.

Sedition

Sedition refers to intentionally inciting others to commit treason, subversion or secession, or to engage in violent public disorder that would seriously endanger the stability of the state. The offence has been substantially narrowed compared with existing provisions.

Under the common law, 'inciting' others to commit a crime, i.e. compelling or encouraging another person with the intent of causing him to commit a criminal offence, is itself an offence.

On top of the common law offence of 'incitement', the provision also introduces the test of 'likelihood' as an additional safeguard. The act of incitement must be likely to induce the relevant serious crimes before it could amount to an offence of sedition.

Seditious publication

'Seditious publication' is confined to those that would be likely to incite others to commit treason, subversion or secession.

The existing offence of possessing seditious publications will be abolished, and the reformed offence of 'dealing with seditious publication' requires an intention of inciting others to commit relevant offences. The freedom of speech, of publication, and of academic research are fully protected under the tight definitions. Whether a publication is seditious will be determined by a jury.

Theft of state secrets

photoSlight amendments are proposed, based on the existing Official Secrets Ordinance. 'Information relating to relations between the Central Authorities and the HKSAR' will be clearly defined as information concerning the HKSAR for which the Central Authorities are responsible under the Basic Law. In relation to this category, an offence may only be committed when one knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that the disclosure would endanger the territorial integrity or independence of China, but still discloses the information. The free flow of financial information will not be impeded.

'Illegal access' to information is strictly limited to obtaining protected information through the five specified criminal means of hacking, theft, robbery, burglary, or bribery. 'Public servant' is clearly confined to public servants of the HKSAR.

Whether the disclosure of information would be damaging or constitute an offence will be determined by a jury. Values of the community will be fully reflected. The freedom of the press and the free flow of information are fully protected.

photoForeign political organisations

Existing Societies Ordinance provisions will be retained to prohibit foreign political organisations or bodies from conducting political activities in the HKSAR, and to prohibit HKSAR political organisations or bodies from establishing ties with foreign political organisations or bodies.

Organisations endangering national security

The power to proscribe organisations endangering national security will be strictly regulated. The existing criteria of proscription will be more tightly defined. A local organisation can only be proscribed under the following circumstances:

* The decision to proscribe a local organisation complies with various freedoms and international human rights standards, as protected under Chapter III of the Basic Law;
* The measure is necessary and proportionate to safeguard national security; and
* One of three preconditions must be satisfied, i.e. the local organisation aims at the commission of specified crimes against the state, or has committed or is attempting such crimes; or the local organisation is subordinate to a mainland one which has been prohibited by the Central Authorities on grounds of national security.
A local organisation will not automatically be proscribed even if it is subordinate to a Mainland organisation prohibited by the Central Authorities by open proclamation.

A local organisation that is proscribed will have the right to appeal to the courts. Prosription itself does not constitute an offence. An offence will only be committed if the proscription is disregarded and the organisation continues to operate.

Prudent enforcement of investigation powers

The Bill clearly specifies that only under exigent situations can a police officer at the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police or above (of which there are now 21 in the Police establishment) authorise the exercise of emergency investigation powers. The search or seizure of journalistic materials may be carried out only if officers have obtained a judicial warrant in advance. The freedom of the press will not be affected.

Top

 

Basic Law 23
Questions and Answers
1. Will processions, public assemblies, demonstrations, etc. be affected under the legislation?
A photoThe rights of assembly, procession and demonstration are protected under the Basic Law and will not be affected. Offences such as 'subversion' and 'sedition' are tightly defined. There is no offence without the intention of causing war, violence or criminal means akin to terrorist activities.
2. After enactment of the legislation, can criticism of government policies or officials continue?
A photoThe freedom of speech is fully protected under the Basic Law. 'Sedition' is limited to intentionally inciting others to commit the serious criminal offences of treason, subversion etc. under Hong Kong laws. Conviction is possible only if there is a likelihood of inducing the relevant offences.
3. Will the organisation of processions without a proper application that results in traffic congestion constitute 'serious criminal means' and hence be regarded as a subversive act?
A Serious criminal means must be a criminal act. The offence of 'subversion' is not committed if the criminal act has not reached an extent that would seriously endanger the stability of the entire state. Processions without prior application and which caused traffic congestions are unrelated to national security, and would be dealt with in accordance with the existing Public Order Ordinance.
4. Will reports on information in relation to diseases in the Mainland, or that embarrasses the government be banned under the legislation?
A The proposals are based on the existing Official Secrets Ordinance, which clearly and narrowly defines the scope of protected information. Information about diseases in the Mainland is not a category protected under the law. Furthermore, disclosures made by those who are not public servants must be 'damaging' (such as endangering national security or causing deaths, etc) to constitute an offence. Embarrassing the government does not amount to 'damaging'. In addition, there are different criteria between the Mainland and Hong Kong regarding which kinds of information are protected. Whether a piece of information is protected would ultimately be adjudicated by Hong Kong courts, rather than defined by government or Mainland standards. Whether one would be convicted will be determined by a jury.
5. Can local religious or political organisations be proscribed arbitrarily by the government under the legislation?
A It is explicitly stipulated in the Bill that a local organisation can be proscribed only when it is necessary in the interests of national security and is proportionate for such purpose. Furthermore, the measure must be taken in compliance with the protection of various rights under Chapter III of the Basic Law, which entrenches international human rights standards. Any measures taken that breach these paramount principles would be unlawful. Organisations that have been proscribed will have the right to apply for a judicial review, or to appeal to the court.
6. Can a person be subject to a 'secret trial' if he or she commits an offence under Article 23 legislation?
A photoAll trials for criminal offences under the Bill will follow the usual procedures. The defendants and their lawyers can attend the entire trial process. There is no question of a 'secret trial'. The special appeal mechanism proposed is limited to the appeal procedure for the administrative decision to proscribe an organisation. The present appeal avenue for organisations proscribed on national security grounds is the Chief Executive in Council. The proposed mechanism has in fact enhanced the independence of the appeal procedure.

 

To find out more about the Bill to give effect to Article 23 of the Basic Law and other relevant information, please visit the website: www.basiclaw23.gov.hk
Security Bureau
June 2003

Top

Last Updated : 27-6-2003
  Copyright/Notice